Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80WQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170915
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 09:05
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6567U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 116
40% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 198
21% 167 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris 550 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 0.09
6% 4.86 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 62 65 61 69 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 80.5
Write 84
Mixed 26
SusWrite 65.2
46% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
66.4% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 16.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WQ Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback