Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200429
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$315
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 66.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,143
99% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,148
133% 2,148 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 96.9
59% 77.2 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 78.2
57% 68.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 120 74 91 80 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 862
Write 514
Mixed 509
SusWrite 157
113% 510 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 29.9
130% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 167
180% 287 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid ADATA SU800 512GB
427GB free
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 152 147 67 144 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 471
Write 463
Mixed 424
SusWrite 147
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 24.8
96% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 82.1
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 134
128% 192 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 80%
Amd-raid Hitachi HDS72101 1TB
151GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 40 35 29 38 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 39.9
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 74%
Amd-raid ST31000524AS 1TB
442GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 61 50 45 54 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 92.8
Write 88.2
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 57.4
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
195% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 27.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $754
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback