Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 09:14
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 809
82% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 129
Parallax 101
102% 118 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 145
Splatting 113
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$59
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 387 367 383 381 368 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,769
Write 1,529
Mixed 1,355
SusWrite 411
283% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 69.2
239% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 720
548% 740 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 203%
Great: 238%
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
460GB free
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 228 231 230 228 230 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,392
Write 1,085
Mixed 926
SusWrite 244
203% 912 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 36.9
196% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 518
451% 674 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 162%
Great: 271%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
257GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 75
Write 72.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 81.2
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
728GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 111 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 107
Write 109
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 111
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 68%
DW USB Dr. 4GB
4GB free, PID 0163
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.5% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.6
7% 6 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
FM MEMORETTE SWING 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.1 7 7.1 7.1 7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Read 24
Write 6.2
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 7
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
44% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.9% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 32.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 30.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback