HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181129
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$647
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 979
88% 741 Pts
64-Core 2,147
133% 2,147 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
HP(103C 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 9.4
9% 11 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 12.5
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 517 479 373 363 349 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2168
Write 1,868
Mixed 1,438
SusWrite 454
330% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 74.1
252% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,079
DQ Mixed 1171
878% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 245%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 19
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 11
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 7 4 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3431 HP 24w
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback