Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 06:37
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 624
60% 497 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 81
Reflection 82.8
Parallax 80.9
66% 81.6 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 66.3
59% 73.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 432
Mixed 338
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 48.9
167% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 219
198% 300 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
4GB free
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 453
Mixed 372
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 53.1
176% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 252
216% 316 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
16GB free
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 457
Mixed 372
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 50.4
168% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 244
211% 311 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$280
66GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 453 430 435 432 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 459
Mixed 423
SusWrite 435
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 55.3
180% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 284
213% 284 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
LaCie d2 Quadra v3C 3TB
66GB free, PID 107e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 27.5
Mixed 25
SusWrite 21.5
35% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 72%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
45GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 18.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 14.6
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.7
171% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
85GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 4.4 2.4 23 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.68% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 5.8
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 12.4
15% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.68%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 34.3
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 19.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback