Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 01:31
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 140
56% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 364
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 44.1
Parallax 39.5
38% 43.3 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 35.7
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 265 304 226 179 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 418
Write 322
Mixed 292
SusWrite 212
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 27.8
90% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 182
144% 201 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 108%
OCZ AGILITY2 60GB
56GB free
Firmware: 1.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 70 73 69 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 170
Write 76.3
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 69.2
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 21.7
77% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 86.3
69% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 51%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
746GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 104 98 103 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 101
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 131 151 132 133 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 97.2
Write 132
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 133
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
257GB free, PID 1004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 26.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 22.1
35% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 19%
SDHC Card 16GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8 7.2 7 7.8 6.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 7.5
16% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
114% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $303
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback