. .

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
System. .  (all builds)
Motherboardhttp://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 07:42
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 69.5
41% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 138
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS-512
Nvidia(10DE 0502) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 3.56
7% 6.82 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 6.04
5% 6.32 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 105 102 107 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 102
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical . Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: . .

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback