Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 75.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 185 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 592 57% 468 Pts	64-Core 855 53% 855 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.1 Reflection 15 Parallax 18.2 16% 17.4 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 19.9 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 476 Write 334 Mixed 332 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 29.7 123% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 33.5 DQ Mixed 17 38% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 85GB free Firmware: JEDOA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 79.3 Write 75.5 Mixed 42 SusWrite 51.8 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 12GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $353

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16