Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-7309

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMSI MS-7309  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 17:23
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 65.1
43% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 64.6
8-Core 61.7
8% 63.2 Pts
64-Core 66.1
4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
MSI(1462 7309) 64MB
Ram: 64MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 97 96 93 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 78
Write 76.5
Mixed 82
SusWrite 94.9
19% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 16.1
51% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 22.2
17% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
25GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 83 83 81 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 67.2
Write 40.8
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 81.3
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7309 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback