Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 209
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 669
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 98.2
Parallax 82.2
75% 90.8 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 104
82% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 171 162 167 162 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 466
Mixed 381
SusWrite 193
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 50.5
170% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 347
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
172GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 198 172 177 181 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 344
Write 199
Mixed 229
SusWrite 183
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 20.2
68% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 98.1
72% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
512GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 128 140 152 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 165
Write 109
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 144
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 34.9
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback