Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 14:26
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 85.7
1-Core 151
2-Core 304
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 886
87% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 375C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 82
77% 88.5 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 82.9
Splatting 73.3
69% 85.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
645GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 144 141 140 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 74
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 106%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
11GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 13 13 13 10 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 8.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 11.9
13% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 8%
Walgreen Infinitive 16GB
3GB free, PID 55a7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.6 8.7 9 9.4 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Read 32
Write 9.2
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 8.8
18% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 3.3
139% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 32.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 31.7
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback