bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 10:05
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 965-$1,244
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 95.5
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 180
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 408
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS-512
XFX(1682 2332) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 3.5
8% 7.48 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 7.43
Splatting 5.96
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 160GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 25 26 90 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 312
Write 49.3
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 50.6
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 13.3
37% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 39.3
69% 142 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36%
Great: 84%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 121 121 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 115
Write 116
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 120
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
155GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 121 120 120 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 118
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback