Matech AP8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMatech AP8B75-M  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 21:15
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 506
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 450.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 65.7
60% 71.7 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 70.7
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 379
Write 377
Mixed 267
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 35.2
126% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 42.5
44% 69 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
202GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 110
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 109%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
62GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 66
Write 66.2
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 64.8
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
25GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 51.4
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 46.2
36% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 59%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
23GB free
Firmware: 04.05G05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 69.9
Write 64.2
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 64.8
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 63%
WD My Passport 25E9 1TB
382GB free, PID 25e9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 41.3
Write 41.5
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 42.3
53% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
161% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 04CD F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 029E CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 04CD F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AP8B75-M Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Matech AP8B75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $479
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback