Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 21:06
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 96
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 460
52% 407 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6950
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 23.4
20% 25 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 17.9
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 101 95 76 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50% Above average
Read 261
Write 125
Mixed 180
SusWrite 87.8
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 26.8
95% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 94.4
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 98.4
77% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 73%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 124 124 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 127
Write 115
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 123
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x524D32353636344241313333392E38465200 0x0198 0x393955353430332D3033342E4130304C4620 0x859B 0x524D32353636344241313333392E38464400 0x0198 0x393955353430332D3033342E4130304C4620 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback