Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory51.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '20 at 18:23
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 254
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 773
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB; Palit Gaming Pro
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 179
Parallax 159
130% 166 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 163
Splatting 117
126% 160 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 123%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$194
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 935 772 1082 1089 1093 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,059
Write 1,052
Mixed 706
SusWrite 986
214% 951 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.8
176% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 586
491% 717 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 192%
Great: 211%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
314GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 677 692 708 695 702 702 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,145
Write 973
Mixed 755
SusWrite 696
200% 892 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 51.8
183% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 728
556% 754 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 179%
Great: 353%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 156 143 160 163 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 142
Write 178
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 151
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 173%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
560GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 118 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 101
Write 105
Mixed 75
SusWrite 118
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 84%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
265GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 40 51 38 34 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 16
Write 39.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 40
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
211GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 71 56 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 81.7
Write 38.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 59.7
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4C3466C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback