Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 20:28
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 772
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 41.2
26% 35.4 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 36
28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As201 240GB 240GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 105 47 37 12 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 46.8
Write 394
Mixed 13
SusWrite 113
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 83.9
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.8
12% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
452GB free
Firmware: AM003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 112 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 112
Write 101
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 112
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
97GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 25 28 29 31 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 48.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 28.9
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 36%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.5
Write 18
Mixed 29.5
33% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.5
99% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback