Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 06:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 186
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 308
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 3.72
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 0.09
2% 3.39 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As201 240GB 240GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFC61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 118 63 64 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 459
Write 316
Mixed 334
SusWrite 120
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 31.5
142% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 174
156% 232 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 175 178 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 178
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 179
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback