QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.3 GB free of 11 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i5-4670
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 193
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 420
56% 416 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 145
Parallax 144
124% 147 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 135
Splatting 109
113% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 117 129 124 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 378
Write 118
Mixed 124
SusWrite 123
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 15.9
73% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 52.1
72% 136 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 11GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 121 116 124 120 116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.5% Above average
Read 387
Write 131
Mixed 125
SusWrite 119
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 17.3
76% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 24.2
53% 113 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 182 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 197
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 182
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback