QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.5 GB free of 11 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '20 at 10:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i5-4670
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 181
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 403
55% 407 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 144
Parallax 146
122% 146 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 134
Splatting 109
113% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 99 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 326
Write 109
Mixed 119
SusWrite 97.5
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 15.2
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 49.1
72% 138 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 177 177 177 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 169
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 176
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback