Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '16 at 12:15
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 379
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 64.2
60% 70.3 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 474
Write 140
Mixed 214
60% 276 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 14.8
115% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 35.7
62% 122 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
455GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 166
Mixed 150
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18.5
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback