Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 81.5 45% 67.7 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 176 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.5% Above average	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 72 Parallax 68.3 58% 70.4 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 70.1 57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 110GB free Firmware: SAFM00.U SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 190 282 111 215 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 182 Write 295 Mixed 228 SusWrite 191 51% 224 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 27 95% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 89.3 DQ Mixed 38.7 36% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 111%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 251 Write 154 Mixed 113 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 14.4 56% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 46.6 DQ Mixed 21.2 20% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 332GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 151 152 156 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 151 Write 105 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 152 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBSR0 F3-10666CL9-4GBSR0 Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.1% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	6x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6950AMDBench 20%, 770 samples	2x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 8GBUnknownBench 36%, 611 samples	3x
99U5403-046.A00LF 9905403-439.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 46%, 7 samples	2x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $399

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16