Today's hottest deals

Novatech PC-1977

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNovatech PC-1977  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H110M-S2H-CF
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 15:24
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 159
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 316
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.6
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 16.8
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$119
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 122 96 108 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 401
Write 215
Mixed 244
SusWrite 108
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 29
85% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 69.3
86% 160 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 111%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
7GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 67 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 54.2
Write 61.9
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 68
73% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC-1977 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Novatech PC-1977

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback