Asus H110M-F

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-F (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180509
Uptime	18.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 06:57
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 199 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 415 52% 394 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 31 Parallax 38 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 35.3 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-E100I/128G 128GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: T170428a SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 48 55 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 363 Write 84.5 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 52.5 30% 141 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 12.3 52% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 48.7 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 41.5 37% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 413GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 126 128 128 127 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 122 Write 122 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 125 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C15 1x8GB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 14.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-F Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-F

CPU
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	41x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	39x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	35x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x
256GB SSD 256GBXraydiskBench 85%, 422 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
CM4X8GF2400C16K2 1x8GBCorsairBench 41%, 108 samples	9x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GBTeamBench 41%, 3,973 samples	7x
MLVD48192MLD-24 1x8GBUnknownBench 39%, 15 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16