Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 12:39
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 74
2-Core 134
61% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 437
41% 339 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 265-$105
Asus(1043 3011) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 36.3
23% 31.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 22
Splatting 34.5
23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 36 23 18 21 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 334
Write 69.1
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 24.5
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 7.2
56% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 6.6
22% 50 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 89%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 205 154 156 137 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 412
Write 332
Mixed 272
SusWrite 182
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 14.3
58% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 44.6
49% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
316GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 113 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 68
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
121GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 60 65 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 41.3
Mixed 42
SusWrite 60.4
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36%
Great: 66%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MB 500GB
6GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 26.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 27.3
35% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback