| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190617 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 15 '19 at 13:16 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.9%
Very good
|
79% 142 Pts
|
63% 528 Pts
|
64% 1,039 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.4%
Average
|
45% 50.1 fps
|
38% 45.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
588GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 66 66 64 66 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
34% 156 MB/s
|
78% 30.9 MB/s
|
79% 110 MB/s
|
|
MD05000-AJDW-RO 500GB
199GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 86 87 86 MB/s
|
48.7%
Average
|
56% 76 MB/s
|
158% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
76.8%
Very good
|
80% 27.8 GB/s
|
64% 22.3 GB/s
|
47% 84.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,393 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,386x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 807x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 471x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 423x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 294x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 293x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $475 |