Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2286M 989 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 50.5 30% 43.4 Pts	4-Core 97.1 8-Core 174 16% 135 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0926) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6999 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 2.19 2% 9.75 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.34 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron 2200S NVMe 512GB 5,553 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: 22001010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 598 615 631 628 661 687 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 797 Write 710 Mixed 723 SusWrite 637 161% 717 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 23.9 75% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 165 124% 167 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 215%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB 2,597 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 840GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 315 326 317 330 342 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63% Good	Read 349 Write 307 Mixed 296 SusWrite 322 72% 318 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 20.9 72% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 159 119% 159 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 133%
SABRENT 1TB 258GB free Firmware: RKT303.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 739 935 708 648 714 744 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 140GB free, PID 0211 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 69 70 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 59.6 Write 67.4 Mixed 31 SusWrite 69.3 77% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 859B0000802C CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 80AD000080AD HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 859B0000802C CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 48GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 12.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	552x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	207x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	140x

SSD
2200S NVMe 512GBMicronBench 167%, 5,553 samples	78x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc601Bench 162%, 6,475 samples	57x
NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 196%, 7,642 samples	40x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	113x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 81%, 2,453 samples	86x
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-VK 2x31.5GBUnknownBench 82%, 266 samples	45x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16