Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5Q  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.73GHz
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 38
2-Core 69.6
42% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 104
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 38.1
36% 37.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 37.2
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 254 276 297 237 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 662
Write 130
Mixed 307
SusWrite 259
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 15.8
66% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 156
115% 151 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback