Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '19 at 22:50
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	KWT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 150 2-Core 301 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 596 8-Core 1,011 98% 803 Pts	64-Core 1,600 99% 1,600 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2730 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.2% Below average	Lighting 41.9 Reflection 48.9 Parallax 39.5 34% 43.4 fps	MRender 60.6 Gravity 41.8 Splatting 55.1 43% 52.5 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 440GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1305 1127 1108 1077 1061 1097 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	297% Outstanding	Read 2324 Write 2,039 Mixed 1,491 SusWrite 1,129 391% 1,746 MB/s	4K Read 54.2 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 77.8 255% 89.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,349 DQ Write 1,158 DQ Mixed 1,248 937% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 297% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 241GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 435 439 449 451 444 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 444 Mixed 387 SusWrite 442 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 45.1 156% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 350 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 894GB free Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 549 554 551 343 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 1,758 Write 540 Mixed 744 SusWrite 450 192% 873 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 18.2 99% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,400 DQ Write 13.6 DQ Mixed 27.5 189% 480 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 298%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.5% Very good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 20.9 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 21.9 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,211x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,167x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	917x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,028x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	795x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	632x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	500x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	490x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	437x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,075

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16