Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q SE PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q SE PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090623
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '19 at 18:54
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8200-$12
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 30
1-Core 28
2-Core 68.5
24% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 72.3
8-Core 73.1
10% 72.7 Pts
64-Core 84.1
5% 84.1 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3499) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 5.57
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 2.12
4% 5.78 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.74
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ADH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 49 35 41 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 43.8
Write 38.5
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 35.4
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
18GB free
Firmware: 3.ADH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 30 46 44 46 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 32.8
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 42.3
27% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 40%
USB Flash Memory 32GB
9GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 4.9 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Read 17
Write 12
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 5.6
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
40% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 255
16% 255 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q SE PLUS Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback