Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 378
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 1.3
3% 5.23 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 69 65 98 42 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 80.8
Write 100
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 67.1
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-014.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 R2.0 Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback