Today's hottest deals

ECS APLD-MINI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemECS LIVA ZE
MotherboardECS APLD-MINI  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 15:45
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 44.9
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 85.8
35% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 90.7
12% 91.1 Pts
64-Core 89.4
6% 89.4 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 9CC7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.16
2% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 2.61
2% 1.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 347 344 354 362 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 405
Write 360
Mixed 344
SusWrite 349
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 13.8
79% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 34.4
56% 109 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde GKH400SO25608-1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APLD-MINI Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS APLD-MINI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback