Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '19 at 19:40
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	UZB-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4350-$57 11,995 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 78 2-Core 138 64% 102 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 233 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 44.2 27% 36 fps	MRender 42.6 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 34.5 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 71 71 72 72 71 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 464 Write 183 Mixed 325 SusWrite 93.9 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 31.8 128% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 32.1 55% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 62GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 169 174 173 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 162 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 173 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 103%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 0001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 3.5 2.6 2.6 3.2 2.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 14.1 Write 1.5 SusWrite 2.7 5% 6.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16