ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	7.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus G74Sx (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110923
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '15 at 01:49
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 73.5 2-Core 143 49% 108 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 414 43% 344 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 31% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M 6,267 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 204A) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 7.44 8% 9.18 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 10.6 9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 971 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 120 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 52 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1741311695	83.9% Excellent	Read 510 Write 410 Mixed 244 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 29.1 100% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 70.2 80% 137 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 124%
Msft Virtual Disk 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 268GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36% Below average	Read 90 Write 35.4 Mixed 48.2 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.22 54% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 84%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50 12,013 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 168GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 168 2383 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2851 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9911 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1804 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 354 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 41 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 160 160 120315 (C2) HDA temperature 108 97 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46.9% Average	Read 77.3 Write 85.7 Mixed 20.6 44% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.26 96% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 65%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB 8,379 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 354GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 78.9 Write 68.6 Mixed 67.6 90% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.22 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	261x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $230Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	208x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 560MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,267 samples	481x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	10x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	9x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	61x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	44x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 447 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $300

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback