Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X7560 7 User benchmarks, average bench 39% None, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 40.2 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 49 25% 38.5 Pts	4-Core 84.1 8-Core 168 15% 126 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Virtual HD 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 143 137 133 118 47 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 128 Write 200 Mixed 158 SusWrite 122 113% 152 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 5.2 920% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 73%
Msft Virtual Disk 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 357GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 167 176 166 172 179 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.7% Excellent	Read 117 Write 193 Mixed 141 SusWrite 173 115% 156 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 5.2 894% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 25GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 58% null MHz 3968, 22608 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 7.3 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325