Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20111215
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 08:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 86.9
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 83.9
52% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 151
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FC90) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.286
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.6
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 44 40 23 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 48.2
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 38.3
31% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback