Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 18:25
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 88.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 142
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 284
26% 215 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 35.3
34% 36 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 33
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 8.1 67 48 18 6.6 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11% Very poor
Read 44.5
Write 188
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 33.1
16% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 3.5
17% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 58.3
40% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 11%
Great: 85%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
29GB free
Firmware: 5.0.2a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 95 102 90 86 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.1% Average
Read 163
Write 122
Mixed 133
SusWrite 96.2
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 23.5
90% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 121
96% 133 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
282GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 32 30 32 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 33.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 32.2
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
787GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 56 57 50 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 175
Write 57.1
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 52.5
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 28GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.4
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback