. .

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	. . (all builds)
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	GUM-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 41.1 2-Core 80 42% 64.4 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 158 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 83C2) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	9.35% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 8.94 8% 10.6 fps	MRender 14.7 Gravity 11 Splatting 14.5 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.35% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: R201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 178 178 184 174 177 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.2% Good	Read 227 Write 200 Mixed 202 SusWrite 173 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 31.5 109% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 174 130% 172 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 91%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 499GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 455GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 67 70 72 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 156 Write 127 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 68.5 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1 254% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 114%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 501GB 465GB free Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 16 11% 16 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s

Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 931GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.5 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 220 Write 180 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 8.5 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.5 388% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 142%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 500GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 465GB free Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 3 2% 3 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical . Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: . .

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	13x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	10x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	7x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
GTX 460 SENvidiaBench 10%, 3,122 samples	4x

SSD
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 67%, 1,599 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	44x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	13x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

. .

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: . .

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)