Jginyue X79M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardJginyue X79M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 08:43
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 146
57% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 626
57% 479 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 42.6
27% 37.2 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 24.3
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 757 407 407 412 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 906
Write 1,217
Mixed 988
SusWrite 593
209% 926 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 43.6
160% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 488
353% 459 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 141%
Great: 210%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
222GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 201 188 191 191 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 325
Write 191
Mixed 208
SusWrite 238
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 21.7
74% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 170
151% 221 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SBFKP1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 234 203 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 233
Write 224
Mixed 207
SusWrite 167
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 22.2
82% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 144
123% 180 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
3TB free
Firmware: MKAOAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 142 146 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 138
Write 103
Mixed 79
SusWrite 142
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CHD- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79M-PLUS Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Jginyue X79M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback