Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '19 at 20:12
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9550 2,773 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.2% Below average	Memory 45.6 1-Core 29.8 2-Core 53.1 28% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 87.2 8-Core 89 12% 88.1 Pts	64-Core 91.8 6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8597) ≥ 4GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 6.65 Parallax 7.91 6% 7.29 fps	MRender 7.95 Gravity 8.93 Splatting 9.35 7% 8.74 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: P181 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 100 97 59 64 79 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.3% Poor	Read 166 Write 86 Mixed 94 SusWrite 79.3 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 11 42% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 30.2 DQ Mixed 14.1 13% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 82%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB 2,251 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 51GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 107 111 127 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 117 Write 109 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 113 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA 750GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 404GB free Firmware: JP3O SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 128 127 127 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 128 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 125 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 72%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 649 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.7 8.8 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Read 15.4 Write 8.3 Mixed 8 SusWrite 8.1 12% 9.95 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 16%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 30GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 7.8 8.6 8.6 5.9 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	2.39% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 7.1 9% 6.45 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 21%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 10GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 121 Write 19.4 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 19.8 48% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.7 106% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M3 78T5663DZ3-CF7 Corsair VS2GB800D2 4GB 400, 400 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 8.2 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	21x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	17x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	11x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	8x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	3x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16