Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3353 36 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 53 34% 48.5 Pts	4-Core 89.4 8-Core 93.2 12% 91.3 Pts	64-Core 97.3 6% 97.3 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 34DB) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.21% Terrible	Lighting 12.5 Reflection 9.85 Parallax 6.56 10% 9.65 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 9.87 Splatting 7.17 7% 9.11 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.21% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
F200 120GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 223 Write 66.2 Mixed 89.7 27% 126 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 5.4 51% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 50.6 DQ Mixed 5.5 14% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 54%
WD WD10EURS-630AB1 1TB 3,395 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 883GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 95 97 96 97 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 101 Write 88.2 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 92 63% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	11x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $150Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	10x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	47x
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	21x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $137