Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 06:46
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 623
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 7.34
6% 27 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 301 308 170 218 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,939
Write 1,566
Mixed 1,076
SusWrite 280
270% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 58.9
191% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 822
617% 823 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 191%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 124 123 126 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 73.3
Write 118
Mixed 66
SusWrite 123
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
226% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 77 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 91.3
Write 82
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 81.5
106% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
181% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 25ED 10TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 71 85 70 54 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 33
Write 32.3
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 77
62% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback