Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4005 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 47.5 1-Core 57.3 2-Core 112 42% 72.4 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 112 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2072) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 2.25 2% 2.64 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 6.09 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 12,305 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 208 208 212 213 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 358 Write 242 Mixed 191 SusWrite 212 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 35.2 127% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 180 136% 185 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 2x4GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	112x
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	75x
Celeron J4025IntelBench 25%, 571 samples	66x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	178x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	107x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG_SkillBench 27%, 42 samples	7x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	6x
GR2400S464L17S/8G Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FBD 12GBUnknownBench 27%, 6 samples	6x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16