Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160321
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 02:28
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 57.2
41% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 163
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Acer(1025 1094) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 15.1
14% 15.1 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 12.8
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 65 69 85 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 89.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 70.2
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback