Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A79XTD EVO (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '15 at 19:50
Run Duration	431 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 63 2-Core 124 42% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 342 36% 286 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E217) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 33.4 Parallax 44.5 29% 37.7 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 38.6 28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 70 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 109441254	43.3% Average	Read 267 Write 191 Mixed 200 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 0.95 70% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 2.02 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 55.6 42% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 115%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB 5,813 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 172GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 75 74 7597 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1088 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21715 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 977 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 62 163209478169 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 128 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 7 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1139	61.5% Good	Read 110 Write 104 Mixed 111 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.33 102% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 60%
Samsung SP0411N 40GB-$30 485 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 5GB free Firmware: TW100-11 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 74 60 4800 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7942 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2153840 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2432 (C2) HDA temperature 205 88 11 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 39584237 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	20% Poor	Read 33.9 Write 35.7 Mixed 18.8 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.29 65% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 29%
JetFlash TS1GJFV30 1GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	3.03% Terrible	Read 10.6 Write 3.6 Mixed 1.38 5% 5.19 MB/s	4K Read 2.67 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 12% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.03% Great: 4%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	26x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	26x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	12x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	13x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GBCrucialBench 47%, 288 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	27x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	14x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $111

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)