PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 04 '19 at 21:53 |
Run Duration | 222 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.1
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 79 82 84 84 MB/s
|
51%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
163GB free
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 83 84 83 MB/s
|
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 128 128 127 126 126 MB/s
|
77.1%
Very good
|
|||
pny USB 2.0 FD 16GB
2GB free, PID 005d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Samsung G3 Station 2TB
125GB free, PID 6014
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
104GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
9.84%
Terrible
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 117 117 117 119 121 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
44.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 521x |
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 331x |
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 191x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 128x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 98x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $168 |