ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-MZGLKAP-00

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MZGLKAP-00 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 42.8 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 104 38% 67 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 207 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.35 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.69 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 6.3 4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$53 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8TM52.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 419 112 161 88 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 354 Write 362 Mixed 355 SusWrite 212 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 39.6 132% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 435 DQ Mixed 352 278% 382 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 119%
Ph6-ce12 0 120GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 111GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 205 199 198 202 196 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 365 Write 325 Mixed 244 SusWrite 208 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 7.8 37% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 104 85% 120 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 697GB free Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 89 89 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 86.9 Write 87.5 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 88.4 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FBD 2x4GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 10.6 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-MZGLKAP-00 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZGLKAP-00

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	24x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	24x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 256GBSpccBench 162%, 15,205 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 2x4GBCrucialBench 72%, 238 samples	3x
CT4G4SFS824A.C8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 54%, 50 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback