Acer Aspire XC-830

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-830  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-830
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 05:23
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 110
40% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Acer(1025 1226) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.5
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900P13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 416
Write 346
Mixed 200
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 14
28% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 170
119% 145 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron_ 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-830 Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-830

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback