Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F
Memory186.9 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 11:36
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 697
62% 524 Pts
64-Core 1,751
108% 1,751 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 108
Parallax 90.2
87% 102 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 95.6
78% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$176
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126KB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 380 401 403 404 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 479
Write 433
Mixed 310
SusWrite 398
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 31.5
105% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 115
85% 106 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 105%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
238GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 412 410 410 411 411 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 480
Write 444
Mixed 370
SusWrite 413
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 30.5
107% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 118
130% 213 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89%
Great: 116%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
2TB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1629 1412 1414 1416 1413 1414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,820
Write 1,749
Mixed 1590
SusWrite 1,450
372% 1,652 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 45.5
160% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 45.8
42% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 214%
Great: 335%
Zotac Sonix NVMe PCIe 480GB-$797
431GB free
Firmware: E7FM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1072 1091 1121 1091 1026 1065 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 931
Write 1,302
Mixed 715
SusWrite 1,078
228% 1,006 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 32.8
122% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 353
253% 308 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 153%
Great: 244%
WDC WD40 00F9YZ-09N20L1 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 151 155 156 156 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67% Good
Read 158
Write 162
Mixed 121
SusWrite 154
202% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
158% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 67%
Great: 68%
WDC WD50 01F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 160
Write 239
Mixed 141
SusWrite 0
179% 135 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
177% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 72%
ST2000DX 001-1CM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 155 156 156 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 194
Write 134
Mixed 89
SusWrite 154
184% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.6
248% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
424GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 121
Write 121
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 0.1
78% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 71%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 139
Mixed 92
152% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 0.9
405% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 1
406% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 92%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.4 0.1 0 0 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 0.1
102% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
148% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A- M393B2G70... 192GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback