Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 22:39
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 182
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 691
62% 522 Pts
64-Core 1,751
108% 1,751 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 142
Parallax 131
105% 134 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,162
Write 2,723
Mixed 2,960
658% 2,948 MB/s
4K Read 111
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 56.7
283% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 472
346% 458 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
8GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 406
Write 348
Mixed 350
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 39
125% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 331
250% 335 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
590GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 134 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 123
Write 130
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 133
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 29.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback