PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130423 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 20 '18 at 23:12 |
Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
PNY(196E 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.9%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
743GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.9 8.7 9.3 9.4 9.7 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
40.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 268x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 184x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 134x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 64x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $175 |